Posted by admin on June 5, 2011 ? Leave a Comment?
by Rachel Krueger
Granted, YA has gotten much more violent since 1967, when S E Hinton?s Outsiders fought each other with KNIVES and a kid committed suicide by cop, and it has gotten more sexually explicit since 1970 when Are You There, God? It?s Me, Margaret would touch her ?special place? to help herself fall asleep.? Oh no, wait.? YA fiction is always sort of like, this.? FOR A REASON.?
Gurdon calls teen fiction ?a hall of fun-house mirrors? that reflect ?hideously distorted portrayals of what life is.?? I don?t know what means this ?hideously distorted.?? Dark And Brooding YA is necessary and valuable and popular because this sort of shit happens in real life (ok, maybe not the werewolfy bits.? But the sudden upheaval of becoming a werewolf (combined with unexpected growth of hair)?? Triumph of analogy). ?Gurdon complains that YA lit contains ?images not of joy or beauty but of damage, brutality and losses of the most horrendous kinds.?? As if anyone has ever needed art to help them cope with joy and beauty, and as though literature wasn?t the shoulder on which the damaged, brutalized and lost can weep.
Life is occasionally very shitty and the teen years are like an uncomfortable, uncertain flame to which said shittiness flocks.? There are BAD INFLUENCES above and beyond those nasty books.? High school frequently says things like ?Bigotry is awesome!? and needs to be countered by novels in which bigotry has real and violent consequences, or is absent altogether.? The power of fiction lies in showing us the aftermath of our worst, but also the potential for our best. ?From the outside YA can look like it?s all angst and Chuck Taylors and co-dependency and it IS those things, but it is those things plus BETRAYAL and DISASTER and COURAGE.
Yet Gurdon also takes issue with the ability of YA to meet teens where they are at, and to give them a voice.? She complains that writing about such ?pathologies? as having been abused *literally dies a little bit and has to come back to finish article* or indulging in self-harm help to normalize these behaviors and make them part of the culturally acceptable lexicon, and encourage them in other young?ins.? This same article earlier asserts that ?reading about homicide doesn?t turn a man into a murderer; reading about cheating on exams won?t make a kid break the honor code,? which strikes me as contradictory logic.? This also presumes that self-harm is a hobby teens pick up because they think it?s rad, not (among other things) a coping mechanism to deal with deep psychological pain.? DEEP PSYCHOLOGICAL PAIN IS NOT CATCHING, or at least, you cannot get it from books.
When Sherman Alexie said what we were all thinking, that there?s ?nothing in [his] book [The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian] that even compares to what kids can find on the Internet? Gurdon responds that ?one depravity does not justify another.?? However, in stark contrast to the internet, which is maintained by trolls and scarab beetles, YA lit is written by adults who love teens, and who get into YA PRIMARILY to be like, Let me help you through these awkward, wretched years.? Given the choice of who to let talk to my kids about what sex is and what bullies are and how to escape the Zombie Apocalypse, I?ll take well-intentioned adults over scarab beetles.
Let?s leave aside for the sake of brevity and of my poor, furious heart that the article discusses ?YA fiction? as though it were a homogenous mass ? as though Alyson Noel?s angsty Immortals were equivalent to John Green?s smart-talking, prank-pulling, good-hearted teens.? Let?s also leave aside the inherent problems in the projected Books for Boys Young Men and Books for Girls?Young Women lists (Ship-Breaker is a book about a BOY and is therefore for BOYS and girls will be like, I don?t understand this dystopic business, where are the prom dresses.? True Grit is about a girl but she is BADASS so it is ALSO for BOYS because girls should stick to books about ?love-struck medieval girl[s] gone mad? [Lisa Klein?s Ophelia]) because who can breathe when they see this in print?
I feel like I am stating the obvious in all of this, like I am arguing that water is excellent for thirst or that apples and baby wolverines are, in fact, two different things.? But here we are, having this conversation, and I am both boggled and saddened by the need, by the fact that there are still people who think that YA will keeeel you (metaphorically, emotionally, ethically) instead of realizing that it is those teenage years that kill you, and that YA might be the only thing to save your ass.
Source: http://backofthebook.ca/2011/06/05/young-adult-fiction-the-poison-is-the-antidote/5167/
k2 love bites feather hair extensions carey hart toxoplasmosis farrah fawcett colon
Sometimes a game is only as good as its villain. And in the ?90s, we had some great ones. Kane, Kefka, Natla, and LeChuck all spring to mind. And then, of course, there?s SHODAN. 
OF COURSE!
The game did well enough to warrant a sequel several years later by the upstart Irrational Games. However, the game was released in the wake of Half-Life?s earth-shattering success and went largely unnoticed until BioShock was released in 2007 and billed as a spiritual successor to System Shock. While it certainly took a lot from System Shock (and Irrational won?t let you forget that they made System Shock 2), let?s just say that Atlas/Fontaine didn?t make quite the impression that SHODAN did. In addition, the RPG elements were largely removed to make the game more palatable to a less hardcore audience and allowed infinite respawns (which certainly was not the case in System Shock 2, as a respawn cost precious nanites).? The game featured RPG mechanics in a first-person shooter format and allowed you to pursue different paths ? as a marine, you have better attack power, as a naval officer you have better technical skills, and as an OSA agent you get psionic powers. The game?s complexity gave it replay value and freedom?that its successors lack. The only down note System Shock 2 hits is a cheesy, terribly conceived ending that reeks of being rushed out the door and meddled with by executives. But I won?t hold that against it. I was so exhausted by the end of the game that I could forgive the fact that the main character?s only dialogue is a flat ?Nah?.
